Sample report

See the proof layer before you scope the job.

Review the kind of redacted WRA and EYA outputs a lender, IPP, or technical advisor expects: WTG-wise AEP, uncertainty, MCP, IEC site suitability, and wake-layout evidence.

WTG-wise P50 / P75 / P90 output example

Representative, redacted structure only. A real report includes the complete turbine list, coordinates, source assumptions, and versioned model notes.

WTG Hub wind speed Gross AEP Wake loss Net AEP P50 P75 P90 Review flag
WTG-0178.14 m/s18.6 GWh7.8%15.9 GWh14.8 GWh13.7 GWhCluster wake sensitivity
WTG-0428.32 m/s19.4 GWh5.9%17.1 GWh15.9 GWh14.7 GWhClean position
WTG-0637.91 m/s17.8 GWh9.6%14.8 GWh13.8 GWh12.7 GWhRidge and wake overlap
WTG-0888.05 m/s18.1 GWh6.4%15.7 GWh14.6 GWh13.5 GWhTerrain transfer check

Uncertainty budget example

Measurement
2.4%
Long-term MCP
3.0%
Spatial / flow
4.1%
Wake model
2.1%
Future losses
1.7%
Total sigma
6.2%

MCP correlation evidence

Example output: monthly climate shape, mast-vs-reference fit, residuals, and selected long-term correction window.

IEC 61400 site suitability matrix

Parameter Site value OEM envelope Status Action in report
Vave at hub height8.2 m/sIEC IIIA platform limitPassDocumented at WTG level
50-year extreme wind V5038.9 m/s42.5 m/sPassExtreme value appendix
Turbulence intensityCategory B/C edgeOEM Class B curveReviewOEM load review recommended for 11 WTGs
Shear and veer0.19 alpha, seasonal veerProject-specificReviewRotor-equivalent wind speed sensitivity
Air density1.11 kg/m3Power curve correction rangePassNet AEP correction applied

Wake and micrositing visual

A bankable layout review should show where wake, terrain transfer, access constraints, and WTG-specific uncertainty change the decision. The output below represents the kind of before/after evidence included in a redacted review pack.

  • Base layout wake loss: 8.4% net AEP impact.
  • Optimized layout wake loss: 6.7% after turbine-position changes.
  • Commercial delta: 1.7 percentage points before financing case lock.

Use the form to request the sample

Tell me what type of report you want to review and who it is for. The answer helps send the right sample and avoids a chain of clarification emails.

Helpful context

  • WRA, EYA, met mast QC, or due diligence.
  • Developer, lender, sponsor, or technical advisor.
  • Any deadline you are working against.
  • If you also want a scoping call, say so.
Book a scoping call

The request submits securely. If the local preview cannot reach the endpoint, it opens a prefilled email draft as fallback.

Need the sample before a committee meeting?

Say that in the request. The work can be scoped around the decision deadline rather than around a generic marketing timeline.